Why Did Grant Shaud Leave Murphy Brown?, Adam Scott Putter Length, Bikers Against Drunk Driving Raffle, Articles C
">

cisco ikev2 error address type not supported

cisco ikev2 error address type not supported

The connection uses a custom IPsec/IKE policy with the UsePolicyBasedTrafficSelectors option, as described in this article.. The Responder tunnel usually comes up before the Initiator. Customers Also Viewed These Support Documents, Branch router, ISR4451-X, version 16.12.1b. - edited Options. Cisco recommends that you have knowledge of the packet exchange for IKEv2. N(Notify payload-optional). I followed the guide and created the IPSEC interface on the service side instead of VPN0, unfortunately I'm getting a IKEv2 failure: IKEv2:% Getting preshared key from profile keyring if-ipsec1-ikev2-keyringIKEv2:% Matched peer block 'if-ipsec1-ikev2-keyring-peer'IKEv2:(SESSION ID = 0,SA ID = 0):Searching Policy with fvrf 0, local address X.X.X.XIKEv2:(SESSION ID = 0,SA ID = 0):Found Policy 'policy1-global'IKEv2-ERROR:Address type 1622425149 not supported. Accepted Solutions. This packet contains: ISAKMP Header(SPI/ version/flags), SAr1(cryptographic algorithm that IKE responder chooses), KEr(DH public Key value of the responder), and Responder Nonce. currently using 4.8, seems to have solved all issues. Hi, made some more tests and my problem is the following, IPSec tunnel can be established if remote end is configured without any specific encryption domains for the communication and with a transport network within the tunnel (for routing purpose - like in GRE Tunnel). Be aware the static route will only be withdrawn from the routing table if the Tunnel goes down. This document describes Internet Key Exchange version 2 (IKEv2) debugs on Cisco IOS when a pre-shared key (PSK) is used. This module describes the Internet Key Exchange Version 2 (IKEv2) protocol. This is the CREATE_CHILD_SA response. You can also check the output of theshow crypto sessioncommand on both routers; this output shows the tunnel session status as UP-ACTIVE. Help would really be appreciated. I'm unsure if Viptela using IOS XE has this same capability. All rights reserved. Thanks again for this article. Tunnel is up on the Responder. Beginner. 03-12-2019 This does present a bit of a problem for inteligent traffic steering. All traffic must be accepted and specific routing is needed to direct traffic into specific tunnels. Refer toCisco Technical Tips Conventionsfor more information on document conventions. 01:52 PM For a branch office VPN that uses IKEv1, the Phase 1 exchange can use Main Mode or Aggressive Mode. Do you had to apply some NAT config? Nonce Ni (optional): If the CHILD_SA is created as part of the initial exchange, a second KE payload and nonce must not be sent), KEi (Key-optional): The CREATE_CHILD_SA request might optionally contain a KE payload for an additional DH exchange to enable stronger guarantees of forward secrecy for the CHILD_SA. Configure Phase 1 Settings For IKEv1. The first CHILD_SA is created for the proxy_ID pair that matches the trigger packet. IPSEC profile: this is phase2, we will create the transform set in here. N (Notify payload-optional): The Notify Payload is used to transmit informational data, such as error conditions and state transitions, to an IKE peer. Cisco recommends that you have knowledge of the packet exchange for IKEv2. Components Used The information in this document is based on these software and hardware versions: Internet Key Exchange Version 2 (IKEv2) Cisco IOS 15.1 (1)T or later Responder sends the response for IKE_AUTH. For more information on the differences and an explanation of the packet exchange, refer toIKEv2 Packet Exchange and Protocol Level Debugging. I'd like to configure a IPSEC tunnel to Zscaler, the interface should be sourced from VPN0 so that i can use the public IP address attached to my DIA circuit. I've tried domain\user, [email protected] and just plain user. My assumption is that although the IPSEC is created on the service side, by sourcing the tunnel from the interface with a public IP address in VPN0, the cEdge would VRF jump to VPN0. If the SA offers include different DH groups, KEi must be an element of the group the initiator expects the responder to accept. They contain the source and destination address of the initiator and responder respectively for forwarding/receiving encrypted traffic. It's in roadmap. The information in this document is based on these software and hardware versions: The information in this document was created from the devices in a specific lab environment. I have a similar problem with an IPSec Tunnel to an external Firewall. Transport side Ike based IPsec is not available in cedge. *Nov 11 19:30:34.841: IKEv2:Adding ident handle 0x80000002 associated with SPI 0x9506D414 for session 8 *Nov 11 19:30:34.841: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: AUTH_DONE Event: EV_OK_RECD_LOAD_IPSEC *Nov 11 19:30:34.841: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):Action: Action_Null *Nov 11 19:30:34.841: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: AUTH_DONE Event: EV_START_ACCT *Nov 11 19:30:34.841: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):Accounting not required *Nov 11 19:30:34.841: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: AUTH_DONE Event: EV_CHECK_DUPE *Nov 11 19:30:34.841: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState:AUTH_DONEEvent: EV_CHK4_ROLE, *Nov 11 19:30:34.841: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState:READYEvent: EV_CHK_IKE_ONLY *Nov 11 19:30:34.841: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: READY Event: EV_I_OK, *Nov 11 19:30:34.840: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState:READYEvent: EV_R_OK *Nov 11 19:30:34.840: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: READY Event: EV_NO_EVENT. I believe it is specific to ISR4K's and being fixed in the November code release. #proposal cisco. *Nov 11 19:30:34.835: IKEv2:KMI message 12 consumed. In addition, this document provides information on how to translate certain debug lines in a configuration. 0 Helpful Share Reply JW_UK Beginner In response to JW_UK Options 09-28-2019 03:19 AM The sample requires that ASA devices use the IKEv2 policy with access-list-based configurations, not VTI-based. Router 1 receives the IKE_SA_INIT response packet from Router 2. The link you shared is for a vEdge setup, the one I've found is for cEdge 16.12.x. A Notify Payload may appear in a response message (usually specifying why a request was rejected), in an INFORMATIONAL Exchange (to report an error not in an IKE request), or in any other message to indicate sender capabilities or to modify the meaning of the request.If this CREATE_CHILD_SA exchange is rekeying an existing SA other than the IKE_SA, the leading N payload of type REKEY_SA MUST identify the SA being rekeyed. IOS XE routers must source IPSEC interfaces from the Service side VPN (not VPN0), but also, it is necessary to add a inbound IPv4 ACL to the Interface in VPN0 to permit UDP 500 (IPSEC) and if using NAT UDP 4500 as well.After the tunnel is established you can add a IPv4 static route on the Service side with a next hop of the Tunnel interface to route traffic via the tunnel. The keys used for the encryption and integrity protection are derived from SKEYID and are known as: SK_e (encryption), SK_a (authentication), SK_d is derived and used for derivation of further keying material for CHILD_SAs, and a separate SK_e and SK_a is computed for each direction. Has anyone ever created an exception list to bypass zscaler in certain situations and go out the DIA door instead? Router 2 builds the response to IKE_AUTH packet that it received from Router 1. It might be initiated by either end of the IKE_SA after the initial exchanges are completed. The sample configuration connects a Cisco ASA device to an Azure route-based VPN gateway. New here? #peer R3. Cisco Community Technology and Support Security VPN Remote Access IKEv2 Auth exchange failed 33016 5 2 Remote Access IKEv2 Auth exchange failed Go to solution mustafa.chapal Beginner 08-08-2018 01:52 PM - edited 03-12-2019 05:29 AM Hi, New here? Router 2 builds the responder message for IKE_SA_INIT exchange, which is received by ASA1. I'll log a TAC case next. Learn more about how Cisco is using Inclusive Language. The CHILD_SA packet typically contains: Router 2 now builds the reply for the CHILD_SA exchange. I am trying to remote access to my Cisco 897VA Router using pre shared key only through Windows 10, Mac OS X and iPhone builtin IKEv2 VPN. If this CREATE_CHILD_SA exchange is rekeying an existing SA other than the IKE_SA, the leading N payload of type REKEY_SA must identify the SA being rekeyed. Phase 1: AES256, SHA384, DH14, SA 28800 Phase 2: AES256, SHA256, PFS2048, SA 3600 I'm getting the error: encryption failure: Ike version: ikev2 not supported for peer I'm new to checkpoint. Related Community Discussions View Bug Details in Bug Search Tool Why Is Login Required? If your network is live, make sure that you understand the potential impact of any command. These parameters are identical to the one that was received from ASA1. IKEv2 is the supporting protocol for IP Security Protocol (IPsec) and is used for performing mutual authentication and establishing and maintaining security associations (SAs). Its a bug where the ZScaler dumps an IP address based on the config_exchange request sent by cEdge devices. This response packet contains: ISAKMP Header(SPI/ version/flags), IDr(responder's identity), AUTH payload, SAr2(initiates the SA-similar to the phase 2 transform set exchange in IKEv1), and TSi and TSr(Initiator and Responder Traffic selectors). Relevant Configuration:crypto ipsec ikev2 ipsec-proposal AES256 protocol esp encryption aes-256 protocol esp integrity sha-1 md5, *Nov 11 19:30:34.832: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_WAIT_AUTH Event: EV_RECV_AUTH *Nov 11 19:30:34.832: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_WAIT_AUTH Event: EV_CHK_NAT_T *Nov 11 19:30:34.832: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_WAIT_AUTH Event: EV_PROC_ID *Nov 11 19:30:34.832: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):Received valid parameteres in process id *Nov 11 19:30:34.832: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_WAIT_AUTH Event: EV_CHK_IF_PEER_CERT_NEEDS_TO_BE_FETCHED_FOR_PROF_SEL *Nov 11 19:30:34.832: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_WAIT_AUTH Event: EV_GET_POLICY_BY_PEERID *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(1): Choosing IKE profile IKEV2-SETUP *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:% Getting preshared key by address 10.0.0.1 *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:% Getting preshared key by address 10.0.0.1 *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:Adding Proposal default to toolkit policy *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):Using IKEv2 profile 'IKEV2-SETUP' *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_WAIT_AUTH Event: EV_SET_POLICY *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):Setting configured policies *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_WAIT_AUTH Event: EV_VERIFY_POLICY_BY_PEERID *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_WAIT_AUTH Event: EV_CHK_AUTH4EAP *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_WAIT_AUTH Event: EV_CHK_POLREQEAP *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_VERIFY_AUTH Event: EV_CHK_AUTH_TYPE *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_VERIFY_AUTH Event: EV_GET_PRESHR_KEY *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_VERIFY_AUTH Event: EV_VERIFY_AUTH *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_VERIFY_AUTH Event: EV_CHK4_IC *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_VERIFY_AUTH Event: EV_CHK_REDIRECT *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):Redirect check is not needed, skipping it *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_VERIFY_AUTH Event: EV_NOTIFY_AUTH_DONE *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:AAA group authorization is not configured *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:AAA user authorization is not configured *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_VERIFY_AUTH Event: EV_CHK_CONFIG_MODE *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_VERIFY_AUTH Event: EV_SET_RECD_CONFIG_MODE *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:Received config data from toolkit: *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_VERIFY_AUTH Event: EV_PROC_SA_TS *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_VERIFY_AUTH Event: EV_GET_CONFIG_MODE *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:Error constructing config reply *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:No config data to send to toolkit: *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_BLD_AUTH Event: EV_MY_AUTH_METHOD *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_BLD_AUTH Event: EV_GET_PRESHR_KEY *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_BLD_AUTH Event: EV_GEN_AUTH *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_BLD_AUTH Event: EV_CHK4_SIGN *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_BLD_AUTH Event: EV_OK_AUTH_GEN *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: R_BLD_AUTH Event: EV_SEND_AUTH *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:Construct Vendor Specific Payload: CISCO-GRANITE *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:Construct Notify Payload: SET_WINDOW_SIZE *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:Construct Notify Payload: ESP_TFC_NO_SUPPORT *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:Construct Notify Payload: NON_FIRST_FRAGS, *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):Next payload: ENCR, version: 2.0 Exchange type:IKE_AUTH, flags:RESPONDER MSG-RESPONSEMessage id: 1, length: 252 Payload contents: ENCR Next payload: VID, reserved: 0x0, length: 224 *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: AUTH_DONE Event: EV_OK *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):Action: Action_Null *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: AUTH_DONE Event: EV_PKI_SESH_CLOSE *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):Closing the PKI session *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: AUTH_DONE Event: EV_UPDATE_CAC_STATS *Nov 11 19:30:34.833: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: AUTH_DONE Event:EV_INSERT_IKE *Nov 11 19:30:34.834: IKEv2:Store mib index ikev2 1, platform 60 *Nov 11 19:30:34.834: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: AUTH_DONE Event: EV_GEN_LOAD_IPSEC *Nov 11 19:30:34.834: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):Asynchronous request queued *Nov 11 19:30:34.834: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1): *Nov 11 19:30:34.834: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState:AUTH_DONEEvent: EV_NO_EVENT, *Nov 11 19:30:34.834: IKEv2:Got a packet from dispatcher *Nov 11 19:30:34.834: IKEv2:Processing an item off the pak queue, *Nov 11 19:30:34.840: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: AUTH_DONE Event: EV_OK_RECD_LOAD_IPSEC *Nov 11 19:30:34.840: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):Action: Action_Null *Nov 11 19:30:34.840: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: AUTH_DONE Event: EV_START_ACCT *Nov 11 19:30:34.840: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: AUTH_DONE Event: EV_CHECK_DUPE *Nov 11 19:30:34.840: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (R) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: AUTH_DONE Event: EV_CHK4_ROLE, *Nov 11 19:30:34.834: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):Next payload: ENCR, version: 2.0 Exchange type:IKE_AUTH, flags:RESPONDER MSG-RESPONSEMessage id: 1, length: 252 Payload contents: *Nov 11 19:30:34.834: IKEv2:Parse Vendor Specific Payload: (CUSTOM) VID Next payload: IDr, reserved: 0x0, length: 20 IDrNext payload: AUTH, reserved: 0x0, length: 12 Id type: IPv4 address, Reserved: 0x0 0x0 AUTHNext payload: SA, reserved: 0x0, length: 28 Auth method PSK, reserved: 0x0, reserved 0x0 SANext payload: TSi, reserved: 0x0, length: 40 last proposal: 0x0, reserved: 0x0, length: 36 Proposal: 1, Protocol id: ESP, SPI size: 4, #trans: 3 last transform: 0x3, reserved: 0x0: length: 8 type: 1, reserved: 0x0, id: 3DES last transform: 0x3, reserved: 0x0: length: 8 type: 3, reserved: 0x0, id: SHA96 last transform: 0x0, reserved: 0x0: length: 8 type: 5, reserved: 0x0, id: Don't use ESN TSiNext payload: TSr, reserved: 0x0, length: 24 Num of TSs: 1, reserved 0x0, reserved 0x0 TS type: TS_IPV4_ADDR_RANGE, proto id: 0, length: 16 start port: 0, end port: 65535 start addr: 0.0.0.0, end addr: 255.255.255.255 TSr Next payload: NOTIFY, reserved: 0x0, length: 24 Num of TSs: 1, reserved 0x0, reserved 0x0 TS type: TS_IPV4_ADDR_RANGE, proto id: 0, length: 16 start port: 0, end port: 65535 start addr: 0.0.0.0, end addr: 255.255.255.255 *Nov 11 19:30:34.834: IKEv2:Parse Notify Payload: SET_WINDOW_SIZE NOTIFY(SET_WINDOW_SIZE) Next payload: NOTIFY, reserved: 0x0, length: 12 Security protocol id: IKE, spi size: 0, type: SET_WINDOW_SIZE *Nov 11 19:30:34.834: IKEv2:Parse Notify Payload: ESP_TFC_NO_SUPPORT NOTIFY(ESP_TFC_NO_SUPPORT) Next payload: NOTIFY, reserved: 0x0, length: 8 Security protocol id: IKE, spi size: 0, type: ESP_TFC_NO_SUPPORT *Nov 11 19:30:34.834: IKEv2:Parse Notify Payload: NON_FIRST_FRAGS NOTIFY(NON_FIRST_FRAGS) Next payload: NONE, reserved: 0x0, length: 8 Security protocol id: IKE, spi size: 0, type: NON_FIRST_FRAGS *Nov 11 19:30:34.834: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: I_WAIT_AUTH Event:EV_RECV_AUTH *Nov 11 19:30:34.834: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):Action: Action_Null *Nov 11 19:30:34.834: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: I_PROC_AUTH Event: EV_CHK4_NOTIFY *Nov 11 19:30:34.834: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: I_PROC_AUTH Event:EV_PROC_MSG *Nov 11 19:30:34.834: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: I_PROC_AUTH Event: EV_CHK_IF_PEER_CERT_NEEDS_TO_BE_FETCHED_FOR_PROF_SEL *Nov 11 19:30:34.834: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: I_PROC_AUTH Event: EV_GET_POLICY_BY_PEERID *Nov 11 19:30:34.834: IKEv2:Adding Proposal PHASE1-prop to toolkit policy *Nov 11 19:30:34.834: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):Using IKEv2 profile 'IKEV2-SETUP' *Nov 11 19:30:34.834: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: I_PROC_AUTH Event: EV_VERIFY_POLICY_BY_PEERID *Nov 11 19:30:34.834: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: I_PROC_AUTH Event: EV_CHK_AUTH_TYPE *Nov 11 19:30:34.834: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: I_PROC_AUTH Event: EV_GET_PRESHR_KEY *Nov 11 19:30:34.835: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: I_PROC_AUTH Event:EV_VERIFY_AUTH *Nov 11 19:30:34.835: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: I_PROC_AUTH Event: EV_CHK_EAP *Nov 11 19:30:34.835: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: I_PROC_AUTH Event:EV_NOTIFY_AUTH_DONE *Nov 11 19:30:34.835: IKEv2:AAA group authorization is not configured *Nov 11 19:30:34.835: IKEv2:AAA user authorization is not configured *Nov 11 19:30:34.835: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: I_PROC_AUTH Event: EV_CHK_CONFIG_MODE *Nov 11 19:30:34.835: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: I_PROC_AUTH Event: EV_CHK4_IC *Nov 11 19:30:34.835: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: I_PROC_AUTH Event: EV_CHK_IKE_ONLY *Nov 11 19:30:34.835: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: I_PROC_AUTH Event: EV_PROC_SA_TS *Nov 11 19:30:34.835: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: AUTH_DONE Event: EV_OK *Nov 11 19:30:34.835: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):Action: Action_Null *Nov 11 19:30:34.835: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: AUTH_DONE Event: EV_PKI_SESH_CLOSE *Nov 11 19:30:34.835: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):Closing the PKI session *Nov 11 19:30:34.835: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: AUTH_DONE Event: EV_UPDATE_CAC_STATS *Nov 11 19:30:34.835: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: AUTH_DONE Event: EV_INSERT_IKE *Nov 11 19:30:34.835: IKEv2:Store mib index ikev2 1, platform 60 *Nov 11 19:30:34.835: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: AUTH_DONE Event: EV_GEN_LOAD_IPSEC *Nov 11 19:30:34.835: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):Asynchronous request queued *Nov 11 19:30:34.835: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1): *Nov 11 19:30:34.835: IKEv2:(SA ID = 1):SM Trace-> SA: I_SPI=F074D8BBD5A59F0B R_SPI=F94020DD8CB4B9C4 (I) MsgID = 00000001 CurState: AUTH_DONE Event: EV_NO_EVENT *Nov 11 19:30:34.835: IKEv2:KMI message 8 consumed. I also had to mention the same ACL in the local policy for this to work. Exceptions may be present in the documentation due to language that is hardcoded in the user interfaces of the product software, language used based on RFP documentation, or language that is used by a referenced third-party product.

Why Did Grant Shaud Leave Murphy Brown?, Adam Scott Putter Length, Bikers Against Drunk Driving Raffle, Articles C

div#stuning-header .dfd-stuning-header-bg-container {background-image: url(https://kadermedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/slider.jpg);background-size: initial;background-position: top center;background-attachment: initial;background-repeat: no-repeat;}#stuning-header div.page-title-inner {min-height: 650px;}
Contact Form
close slider